world-run-clean-energy

The World Could Run on 100% Clean Energy by 2030 Using Existing Technology (Video)

The technology needed to power the world with clean energy already exists — it just needs to be brought to scale over the next 20-40 years. This isn’t the musing of some pie-in-the-sky renewable energy utopianist, either; it’s the conclusion of a recent study by a two university researchers. Stanford researcher Mark Z. Jacobson and UC-Davis researcher Mark A. Delucchi have just published a paper in Energy Policy arguing that it’s not lacking technology that’s holding us back from a clean-powered future — it’s social and political will.

In the paper, they lay out a vision of how 90% of the world could get its energy from solar and wind plants, and the remaining 10% would be comprised of a mix of hydro, tidal, and geothermal power. Jacobson explains the vision in this brief video:

As Jacobson notes, millions of people still die from the pollution emitted by coal-burning power plants every year, and of course, and then there’s that tiny problem of global climate change. In other words, there’s reason enough for the world to embrace some such plan to drastically change its energy supply.

Beyond what’s mentioned in the video, the vision put forth by the researchers extends to transportation, too — all of our vehicles should be running on clean power, too, of course. Here’s a breakdown of the blueprint, as explained by Standford University News:

The world they envision would run largely on electricity. Their plan calls for using wind, water and solar energy to generate power, with wind and solar power contributing 90 percent of the needed energy. Geothermal and hydroelectric sources would each contribute about 4 percent in their plan (70 percent of the hydroelectric is already in place), with the remaining 2 percent from wave and tidal power. Vehicles, ships and trains would be powered by electricity and hydrogen fuel cells. Aircraft would run on liquid hydrogen. Homes would be cooled and warmed with electric heaters – no more natural gas or coal – and water would be preheated by the sun.

Following this road map, all new energy generation would come from already-existing clean sources — wind, water, and solar — by 2030. Bundling energy sources, and instituting efficiency measures could reduce the world’s energy demand by some 30% — to around 11.5 terrawatts. And by 2050, all of the coal plants would be converted or taken off line entirely. There would then be enough capacity to run the world on clean energy by 2030, and dirty energy sources could be eliminated altogether by 2050.

But then there’s that gaping lack of societal, political, and let’s not forget, commercial will. The sort of will that entrenched fossil fuel industries have no interest in promoting. And that’s why, perhaps, this can be filed under ‘Utopian vision’ after all — a planet free from human-generated carbon emissions, in under 40 years no less, would take the sort of global mobilization and cooperation that’s rarely been seen in a single society, let alone a planet.

It’s also interesting to see how more and more visions of clean energy utopias are emerging in response to the climate crisis — blueprints for worlds and societies that run exclusively and entirely on renewable power. These sort of utopias are a departure from the more traditional social utopias — but perhaps it would follow that once dirty energy were eliminated, and one of the major engines of global consumption sated, perhaps a more egalitarian social order would follow?

Regardless, these scientists make it clear — we could enact a plan like this. It’s entirely possible. It’s not technology that’s lacking — it’s our collective desire to live sustainably.

Image: Power & Energy

About Brian Merchant

Brian Merchant is a founding editor of the Utopianist.. When he's not helming the Utopianist, he is TreeHugger's politics writer, contributes the Getting Samy Out of Burma column to GOOD.is, and freelances for the likes of Salon and Paste. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

57 thoughts on “The World Could Run on 100% Clean Energy by 2030 Using Existing Technology (Video)

  1. Yours is an Utopian idea Mark Z. Jacobson and Mark A. Delucchi. Even simple Solar Cooker has not reached people in developing countries. Renewables can only supplement conventional energy but not replace them. Only this THINK BIG ideas in Renewables are coming from West but not from East. It is political will that determines the success of any technology. With Change of Political parties in parties often policies are left out. Let us be neither optimistic nor pessimistic but realistic.

    Put the RENEWABLES to WORK: To get inexhaustible, pollution-free energy which cannot be misused.

    Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore (AP),India
    Wind Energy Expert
    E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

  2. Yours is an Utopian idea Mark Z. Jacobson and Mark A. Delucchi. Even simple Solar Cooker has not reached people in developing countries. Renewables can only supplement conventional energy but not replace them. Only this THINK BIG ideas in Renewables are coming from West but not from East. It is political will that determines the success of any technology. With Change of Political parties in parties often policies are left out. Let us be neither optimistic nor pessimistic but realistic.

    Put the RENEWABLES to WORK: To get inexhaustible, pollution-free energy which cannot be misused.

    Dr.A.Jagadeesh Nellore (AP),India
    Wind Energy Expert
    E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

  3. Superb blog you have here but I was curious if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the same topics talked about here? I’d really like to be a part of group where I can get feedback from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thank you!Sugarland Roofing Contractor, 517 W. Hilary Circle, Sugar Land, TX 77498 – (281) 724-3750

  4. Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was
    just wondering if you get a lot of spam feedback? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can recommend?

    I get so much lately it’s driving me insane so
    any assistance is very much appreciated.

  5. I blog often and I seriously appreciate your content.

    This article has really peaked my interest. I’m going to take a note of your site and
    keep checking for new information about once a week.
    I subscribed to your Feed too.

  6. Have any of the renewable energy fans looked at the size of the installations required to provide all this electricity? I quote figures from existing sites. Sinkin solar site in Oregon, classed as 200 MW site requires 200 acres of land. Shepheards Flat wind farm 845 Mw takes up 30 sq. miles of land. When you factor in efficiency, turbines currently averaging 19.6% and solar 19% ,in new condition,you are going to need a lot of land. Paolo verde nuclear plant just recently opened is rated at 3,875 Mw with an efficiency rating of over 90% covers 6.25 sq. miles. To match this output Sinkin would need 282 sq. miles, about the size of New York. S Flats would require about 460 sq. miles, close to the size of Los Angeles. Both these renewable installations are set in the most favourable sites for their needs, so you cannot apply the principle to the entire world. California maintains a green energy policy and is down to Gas only of the fossil fuel burners. Except of course this is not strictly true, as due to shortfall in electrical supplies they are forced to buy in oil,coal,gas and nuclear generated electricity from neighbouring states. So worldwide what do we do, have a lottery and say OK you can have green energy, topped up from next door. Next door you have to generate by conventional means and suffer all the pollution. Meanwhile the Biomass is gradually burning it’s way through the worlds forests. If it takes Germanys new power plant in Hamburg 11,000 tons of coal per day, imagine how many trees that is? OK replace trees with Maize, so where are we going to grow our food then? It may sound like I am a committed backer of nuclear. Not absolutely true, but basically I see no alternative to reduce carbon emissions NOW, although it is probably too late to stop major climate change NOW. What was Kyoto about? It was not about renewables per se, the words were REDUCE CARBON EMISSIONS. If the Anti Nuclear people took off their blinkers, got into some serious research of deaths from the various methods of generation, they would see nuclear at the bottom of the list and the FEASIBLE alternatives, coal,gas, oil, killing hundreds of thousands of people. Someone ask these 2 bright scientists to give out a simple set of statistics to prove their case.

  7. I am curious to find out what blog system you happen to be working with? I’m having some small security issues with my latest blog and I’d like to find something more secure. Do you have any suggestions?|

  8. 626542 827391The posh distributed could be described as distinctive; customers are in fact yearning for bags is actually a Native aspirations. Which strange surroundings is built that is to market diversity furthermore importance with travel and leisure market trends. hotels particular offers 521432

  9. Among the different forms of anchored and personal loans, the application technique of payday
    would be the easiest The people involving United Kingdom can offer an having access to crisis lending
    products UK, nevertheless they must be folks of this country

  10. 246493 223962This douche bag loves his illegal bretheren because hes a itiaen with the world and we really should be ashamed of ourselves I got news for you Asswipe get your asswiping ass back towards the craphole exactly where you came from with all of your illegal beaners 807085

  11. 807534 672069Hey mate, .This was an superb post for such a hard topic to speak about. I appear forward to seeing several a lot more superb posts like this 1. Thanks 63793

  12. 807955 68099Hi there, just became aware of your weblog by means of Google, and located that it is actually informative. Im gonna watch out for brussels. Ill be grateful should you continue this in future. Several folks will likely be benefited from your writing. Cheers! 324533

  13. 597713 524655Spot lets start on this write-up, I seriously believe this incredible website requirements a lot much more consideration. Ill much more likely once once more to read an excellent deal much more, numerous thanks that info. 674647

  14. 268533 982537Hello there! I could have sworn Ive been to this weblog before but soon after checking by way of some with the post I realized it is new to me. Anyhow, Im surely glad I identified it and Ill be bookmarking and checking back regularly! 297677

  15. 663337 234380Oh my goodness! a wonderful post dude. Thanks Nevertheless My business is experiencing problem with ur rss . Dont know why Not able to sign up for it. Possibly there is any person obtaining identical rss difficulty? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx 54341

  16. 345778 426327I discovered your weblog internet site internet site on the search engines and check several of your early posts. Always sustain up the quite very good operate. I lately additional increase Rss to my MSN News Reader. Seeking for toward reading considerably far more on your part later on! 918206

  17. 953857 784760An intriguing discussion is worth comment. Im certain that you merely write regarding this topic, might possibly not be considered a taboo subject but typically persons are too little to communicate on such topics. To an additional. Cheers 796370

  18. 962246 320271His or her shape of unrealistic tats were initially threatening. Lindsay utilized gun first basic, whereas this girl snuck outside by printer ink dog pen. I used absolutely sure the all truly on the shade, with the tattoo can be taken from the body shape. make an own temporary tattoo 908364

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *