About
RSS
Like
Follow
  • Jukebox
  • Environment
  • Culture
  • Economics
  • Science/ Technology
  • World
  • Utopias
    • If technological progress continues, is at least a semi-utopia on the horizon?
    • Imagine a society where nobody steals bikes (video)
    • Utopia of the Day: Digital Limitism
    • Giant ‘Ark’ Designed to Preserve Humans, Protect Nature
    • The Utopia-Mobile: The Ultimate in Modern, Mobile Off-Grid Living
Big Ideas in Culture

How Effective Are Toy Gun Exchange Programs?

Written by: Anna Loza

5 Comments 26 August 2011

Newark Toy Gun Exchange Program

Newark has had a record-breaking violent summer this year — the most violent in a decade — but the neighborhoods has always been more violent than residents would like. Gun violence has become so pervasive that it is regular for teenagers and those in their early twenties to be involved in shootings — just this past Sunday two young men were killed in separate shootings.

Obviously, the things which lead a city down this road accumulate over many years, are numerous and often quite elusive; a multidimensional issue like youth violence begins to feel too large and unapproachable, especially when one looks for the answer to ‘solve it all’. Perhaps that is why the anti-violence grassroots group Stop Shootin’ Inc. decided to do the one thing they could: get out in the neighborhood and actively promote change, starting with the youngest generation.

Called Stop Shootin’ Music, it was a festival-style event where the group played anti-violence themed music (I’m sure it was still catchy and hip) and asked kids to bring in their toy guns — or any weapon — for an exchange. Kids could trade in their guns for a choice of many non-violence-themed toys such as a hockey stick and puck, Barbie dolls, electric cars, headphones, and the like. A program called Book’em Newark also donated one age-appropriate book per child, so a toy gun ended up getting each kid quite a lot of goodies! South Ward Councilman Ras Baraka has vehemently supported the Book’Em compaign: “Literacy is probably the No. 1 deterrent to crime that gets under-talked about, under-resourced, under-utilized. Literacy is key. Populations of cities that have low crime have high literacy and high civic engagement.”

The idea seems like a great way to promote a positive way of thinking about something that has been tearing the neighborhood apart for years. However, psychologists say gun play is not associated with violent behavior later in life, and that kids will always find a way to act this way, toy prop or not, because it is a way to practice social scenarios, including problem-solving.

Some people and websites have responded negatively to the initiative, outright bashing it as a waste of time in the piece itself or talking about its futility in the comments, saying that a gun is a simple tool until put into the hands of a person who chooses its action. Some want to see action taken on the bigger issues, like single-parent homes, schools and a welfare state — but those are not issues that a grassroots group can effectively tackle, and especially not “solve” — in my opinion, the Toy Gun Exchange is an effective stab at a problem that feels as large as its constituent parts.

The Stop Shootin’ Music Toy Gun Exchange Program was a great way to catch both kids’ and parents’ attention. It may very well be the case that parenting plays a role in the way toy guns are eventually perceived by the child, and that most of the time toy gun play has nothing to do with choices down the road — bullying and abuse have been linked to violence later on — but it is still the case that this program might have a benefit. Although kids can and probably will use that hockey stick they got as a weapon, as some commentators have suggested, the dialogue about guns took place and has been added to their personal understanding of the issue.

Adult guidance may be lacking for some children in a neighborhood where gun violence prevails — hearing news about shootings, stories about young man possible ‘suceeding’ at gun fights or any other such gun-related conversation could skew the perceptions of a child; reminders like the Gun Exchange may be worthwhile and timely for certain individuals. In the very least, I admire Stop Shootin’ for the brainpower and organizational power they have put into the event. Surely a child who has been given a book is a not a child at a loss.

The program’s effect may not be traceable years from now, but perhaps this can catch on as a yearly tradition and eventually peter out as the toy becomes less popular. Newark Mayor Cory Booker says: “This is really what our community needs. We don’t just need police, law enforcement, we need really activism in our community, taking back our streets, taking back our neighborhoods.”

Let’s hear what your opinion is!

Follow the Utopianist on Twitter and Facebook.

Featured image: woodleywonderworks/Flickr,cc via CBS New York

 


[Translate]

Share:

  • delicious Bookmark on Delicious
  • digg Digg this
  • facebook Recommend on Facebook
  • reddit Share on Reddit
  • stumble Share with Stumblers
  • technorati Share on nuJIJ
  • tumblr Tumblr. this
  • twitter Tweet this
  • rss Follow this posts comments
  • print Print for later
  • bookmark bookmark
  • email Tell a friend

Related stories:

  1. The Muslim Human Shield: A Case Study in Religious Solidarity
  2. New York City Considers Free Parking for Pregnant Women
  3. Artist Uses Building-Sized Portraits to Fight for Women’s Rights
  4. Google’s Utopian Art Project Lets Everyone Access the World’s Museums
  5. Film Short ‘Digital Antiquities’ Imagines Future Where All Our Data is in the Cloud (Video)

Categorized in: Big Ideas, Culture
Tagged in: child, exchange, gun, kids, new york, newark, social programs, teenager, toy gun, violence

Your Comments

5 Comments so far

  1. Aaron says:
    August 26, 2011 at 1:50 pm

    My opinion: I think a program that discourages this type of horseplay will have either no effect or an undesirable effect on violence later in life. Unstructured horseplay of several types (this included gun play) allows young boys (I assume gun play is primarily engaged in by boys) to learn social skills. Lack of social skills and interaction can only exacerbate violence later in life.
    One learns boundaries with unstructured horseplay. You quickly learn how to read social cues such as “You can go this far and no further to get what you want from me” based on the positive or negative reactions from the other participants. Without this experience, I think you get people who cannot intuitively determine social boundaries get in trouble.
    Thus I think this is an program with the danger of an unintended consequence of creating older boys with a stunted ability to recognize the social cues that might keep them from engaging in violence later. At best it will have no effect on violence and at worst it will increase it. The money and time spent on this could be better spent on more effective activities. An attempt to effectively structure unstructured play is silly.
    If someone has evidence to the contrary, I would love to see it.

    Reply
    • Aaron says:
      August 26, 2011 at 1:51 pm

      Wow, I hit “post” too soon and I do not seem to have a way to edit the post after to fix my typos. Be kind.

      Reply
      • Anna Loza says:
        August 26, 2011 at 2:29 pm

        Hi Aaron,

        Your comments are definitely valid. However, would you consider hockey a form of unstructured play? The kids will most likely not follow any specific rules, but instead make their own, just as I assume gun play has. I see your point about unstructured play and learning boundaries, but is it the case that this sort of thing can *only* be learned with guns? But yes, I agree with you in some respects.

        Reply
        • Aaron Harmon says:
          August 27, 2011 at 1:23 am

          No, I just think that focusing on guns is silly. Why not focus on toy swords or plastic hammers? Even real gun buy-back programs have no effect on violence, what can a fake gun buy-back program possibly accomplish? Too much focus is on the tool that someone might use to misbehave and not enough is focused on the causes of the poor behavior (dysfunctional families, stress, poverty, poor education, substance abuse, etc). Why not keep kids from playing with toy cars to discourage reckless driving later in life?

          I am not saying that it can only be learned with toy guns, I just do not see why it can’t also be learned with toy guns. Since there is no correlation between kids playing guns as kids and adult violence (as mentioned in the article), then why take that away? Plus if you make a big deal and take away toy guns, isn’t that going to increase the mystique of a real gun should the kids come across one? That way lies danger. Kids need to process the reality of guns in society. I think it has something to do with learning to deal with something dangerous. Kids had no need to play with toy guns before guns came about, but they played with wooden swords and such for the same reasons.
          Hockey is not unstructured play, it has rules. That is the exact opposite of unstructured play. I am talking about the social skills learned in exchanges like “I shot you! No you didn’t! Yes I did!”
          Kids need to learn how to intuitively apply the principles of proper behavior in unexpected situations. Unstructured play allows that.

          Reply
  2. Sean says:
    November 7, 2011 at 5:43 pm

    I love this idea!! Except real guns only, I am going to start a campaign in MY city and trade toys and mp3 players for guns to add to my collection!

    Oh wait, I am in Ky. and even the hillbillies here aren’t that dumb.

    Take away guns and they will kill with knives. Take away the knives and they will kill with stones. Take away the stones and they will kill with their bare hands.. you can’t fix stupid so give everyone a gun to protect themselves.

    An armed society is a polite society.

    Reply

Share your view

Post a comment

Click here to cancel reply.

The Utopianist – Think Bigger

  • The singularity art of Jonty Hurwitz

  • Lower Dens “Propagation” Video: Androids commune with nature

  • “Time” by Merchandise is swirly future guitar rock

  • Black Moth Super Rainbow’s “Spraypaint” tells it like it is

Ad

© 2013 The Utopianist – Think Bigger. Powered by WordPress.

English Afrikaans العربية Беларуская български català česky Cymraeg dansk Deutsch ελληνική español eesti فارسی suomi français Gaeilge galego עברית हिन्दी hrvatski magyar bahasa Indonesia íslenska italiano 日本語 한국어 lietuvių latviešu македонски bahasa Melayu Malti Nederlands norsk polski português română русский slovenčina slovenščina shqipe српски svenska Kiswahili ภาษาไทย Filipino Türkçe українська tiếng Việt ייִדיש 中文 (简体) 中文 (繁體) powered byGoogle